Flat-Stick Wiz - Cameron Smith Is The Players Player And Then Some - Dog Leg News

About the author

Tom Edrington

Tom Edrington spent the first 10 years of his misguided youth as a sports writer for the Tampa Tribune. His career brought him face to face with many of sports greatest stars -- Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus, Muhammad Ali, Don Shula, countless Hall of Fame NFL stars, more PGA Tour players than he can count. In 1980 he was honored by the Golf Writers Association of America for writing the best news story that year, his coverage of Jack Nicklaus' U.S. Open victory at Baltusrol. Today, 36 years later, golf is still a great part of his life, thanks to competitive playing days and the wonderful people he has met on this fabulous journey.

Related Articles

3 Comments

  1. 1

    baxter cepeda

    Cam Smith was always going to be on the short list of picks for the Masters; now he may be the pick for the first major of the year.

    He is sometimes squirrelly off the tee but just gets better and better as he gets closer to the hole, which is so refreshing; reminiscent of Tiger on the greens. He just puts on a show. Clinics really.

    Like Tiger Cam is so good for business compared to all those have nots on the greens whom regularly kill the business with so many flat performances in that critical part of the game which anyone can do. The worst thing for pro tour golf is fans justifiably saying ‘I can putt better than that’.That doesn’t happen with Cam.

    If Cam can win the Players, which is quite penal off the tee, he has to be dripping saliva licking his chops for Augusta.

    Zalatoris also has all the tools Tom describes that Cam has on the greens. But Tom left out the one Will is missing, which is technique, which as McGinely said “begins and ends with that “. Cams technique, tempo, rhythm, are pretty much perfect by all accounts.

    Speaking of which Keegans technique looks amazing with the regular putter. He took a 2 stroke penalty early in the week for something and playing to win down the stretch cost him a few more, but Keegs reminded me of his major winning days. I would watch out for him. Zalatoris should as well.

    Casey was too conservative on 12 and 16. He made birdie on 12 and par on 16 but could have gone eagle-birdie on those two risk-reward holes if he sacked up and played bold in those moments.

    Lahiri certainly put it on the line. The birdie at 17 was just as aggressive and impressive as Cams. Leaving it short on 18 was disappointing—maybe too much there —it happened to players all day. But the chip was pretty. It just wasn’t meant to be. Still getting 2.1$ million it’s hard not to feel Lahiri who had been struggling mightily was a big winner this week; especially considering he mostly attributed his random success to adding the equivalent of 3 dollar bills of lead tape weight to each of his irons.

    Overall the course was a winner in how it held up but while so many things went well, we saw so much more evidence yet again of why it is still not a major.

    17. First, I wouldn’t change a thing about it. You cannot change a thing about it as Chamblee and Steve Williams of all duos suggested this week. If they do change 17s design or when it is played in the round or whatever, they should listen carefully for Mr Dye rolling over in his grave.

    17 is an iconic hole and you simply don’t change icons. As Phil may say Chamblee thinking he can improve the iconic Dyes iconic 17th is obnoxiously arrogant. And I must say chamblees argument that too much is left to chance there is not well though out as well imo. While I appreciated his arguments because they help reinforce this is not a major, which it isn’t—this is hardly a course the other majors would use much less use every year— but he is just wrong arguing so much comes to chance and luck there. When the wind is in from the left, the hole punishes all those one dimensional style players whom cannot control spin and play a pull fade exclusively. Shot makers who can take a little off it like JT. Guys with little draws like Kisner. Guys whom can step up and hit a shot like Cam. There’s a lot of ways to be successful playing 17 in any conditions.

    The problem for many of these guys don’t have those shots because most courses don’t test those shots. I wouldn’t change a thing about the hole because theoretically it rewards guys whom still have some of these lost arts in how to play these shots properly.

    The problem for Sawgrass is there seems to be no time of year for it to be just right for a major. March clearly has problems. We saw this week why they ditched March in the first place.
    They struggled in May growing grass. Growing conditions would only get tougher in the other summer months. Unless they are going to start the season at tpc sawgrass in The fall, wait the NFL…your get my point. No good time.

    Florida is an amazing golfing state but there’s a reason few majors have been held there and when they are they are not the most popular.

    Cam on the other hand is getting more and more popular. Chicks may dig the long ball but golf fans are suckers for a beautiful putter.

    1. 1.1

      Tom Edrington

      If your girls can develop a putting stroke like Cam’s, they’ll win a LOT of tournaments!!

      1. 1.1.1

        baxter cepeda

        They can both putt but Cam is giving us a lot to review today because he pretty much does everything right IMO.
        Especially in this not so penal era of golf I tell them it’s one of the most important parts of the game in order to separate themselves. Meanwhile Im sometimes confounded overhearing pga teaching pros telling their junior students it’s not that important. I’m not saying they all say that but I’ve definitely heard it.

Leave a Reply

Copyright Dog Leg News 2015 | Terms | Privacy